🔗 Share this article

As any prominent honors show nears, one notices an outcry for introducing additional classifications to recognize underappreciated efforts and satisfy the spirits of followers with niche passions.

A fellow writer previously argued advocating for terror-themed awards. It would be amazing. The same goes for board games, this being someone's personal cause. However, I must insist for pushing forward since similar to dedicated enthusiasts, there's a strong justification backing this proposal stands as crucial and important of all. The demand is this: It's essential to create a category for puzzle games.

Categorizing Game Types

Classifying creative works isn't exact; opinions vary greatly, and inevitably spark debates concluding with vague boundaries. It's understandable that cinema institutions avoid this approach. But it is a necessary evil in the world of gaming, that demonstrate such variety they hardly constitute one unified medium.

For comprehensive acknowledgment of gaming accomplishments to receive acknowledgment, while allowing diverse titles to have a chance for representation, classification by type becomes crucial.

Existing Game Classification System

Prominent interactive entertainment events offer these classifications covering Action, Adventure-action titles, Role-Playing, Fighting, Simulation and strategy titles, and Sports/Racing games. Between them, these classifications successfully include a lot of ground, making space possible accommodating various experiences.

Not so for logic-based experiences. No appropriate category exists to accommodate them. Examine these examples from recent excellent titles, showing diverse approaches: the architectural riddles from a specific release, intense tile-matching in a different title, and the sweetly sociological logic puzzles from additional release. Where could they possibly go between these six categories? Nowhere, that’s where.

The Representation Problem

There are dozens of brilliant puzzle games published annually lacking appropriate categories at major award shows, except when they manage to fit award groups including Handheld titles, Virtual reality experiences, or the intensely contested Indie races.

• A renowned logic title received no recognition in any category during that awards season
• A different innovative game was excluded in 2019
• A beloved organization game got ignored in 2021
• Only a few puzzle games scraped into small studio or handheld classifications

Value of Brain-Teasers

These are often small games, however the design of the puzzle game is of massive significance. Well-known matching games count as most popular titles globally maintaining this status for many years.

The iconic tile-matching title competes with popular creative games claiming status as most purchased experience; it’s also in the running for top gaming experience. Brain-teasers form essential building blocks to the art of video games, and they are in conversation across multiple categories.

Recommendation and Reasoning

Logic titles wouldn't face this problem. One could readily select five nominees with fascinating, diverse, deserving games every year with ease — or rather, with difficulty, given the need to exclude many worthy titles.

Restating the point, these include experiences lacking appropriate categories at major gaming awards. Puzzle game makers are working at the demanding boundary of video game design, creating some of most fundamental forms of gaming itself. Similar to film action specialists, they merit acknowledgment. We shouldn't delay decades.