🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion state that indecision over how to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while working overseas. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need good local conversations to find the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in life after death, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of hallowed earth.